In addition to the property access case that was the subject of today's NLRB annoucement, there are a number of other important cases awaiting Board action. Click HERE to view our very lengthy summary of several important pending NLRB Cases.

Here's a  much shorter summary:

• Is it illegal for an employer and a union to “pre-negotiate” certain terms and conditions of employment in a neutrality agreement entered into before the union becomes the representative of the employees in question? Dana Corp., 7-CA-46965.
• Does a union’s request for a neutrality agreement constitute a current request for recognition that will trigger an employer’s right to petition the Board for a secret-ballot election? Marriott Hartford Downtown Hotel, No. 34-RM-88.
• Should the bar on decertification petitions that applies during the first year after a union becomes the representative of a unit of employees be shortened in situations where the union acquired representative status through voluntary recognition? Dana Corp., No. 8-RD-1976; Metaldyne Corp., No. 6-RD-1518.
• Does an agreement between an employer and a union to require recognition of the union at any business subsequently acquired by the employer once a majority of the employees at that business designate the union as their representative waive the employer’s right to demand a secret-ballot election? Shaw’s Supermarkets, 1-RM-1267.
• What restrictions, if any, may an employer place on its employees’ use of a company e-mail system for Section 7 activities? Guard Publishing Co., No. 36-CA-8743-1; Prudential Ins. Co., No. 22-RC-12173.