The email sent will contain a link to this article, the article title, and an article excerpt (if available). For security reasons, your IP address will also be included in the sent email.
By Richard Haygood
On December 3, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sprint v. Mendelsohn, 466 F.3d 1223 (10th Cir. 2006), cert. granted, 127 S.Ct. 2937 (2007). The case has received national media attention for raising the question of whether so-called “me too” evidence (testimony from other employees claiming they were also subjected to discrimination) is admissible to support a plaintiff’s claim of individual employment discrimination.
Return to Article